1940
As a speaker, writer and member of many Committees, Harold Nicolson was very active in what Churchill later called 'these months of pretended war', but his activity, like that of everyone else, was a whirring in a vacuum. All were awaiting Hitler's next move. Scarcely one proposal for an Allied initiative survived the discussion stage. Aid to the Finns was still under debate when at last the Russians broke through the Mannerheim Line in mid-March and Finland capitulated. The 'Altmark' incident on 16th February was the bright spot in a winter of exceptional cold and gloom. At home Hore-Belisha's replacement at the War Office by Oliver Stanley was more popular in Parliament than with the general public, and Chamberlain's leadership was accepted on sufferance until great events should reveal its inadequacy.
DIARY 1st January, 1940
A pleasant dinner with Cyril Joad and Vita. We listen to Lord Haw Haw afterwards. Joad does not think that he will have any effect on his young pacifists. It is upon the middle, uncertain people that he will have an effect, the untrained mind. He simply must be answered. Joad teases me for being self-depreciative. He says that I lack the competitive instinct and that I never throw the whole of myself into what I believe. He is, in a way, right about this. But what does it come from? Do I lack courage? But in the House I have been brave enough. It cannot be fear of responsibility or hard work, since I enjoy both. It is, I suppose, a profound disbelief in myself coupled with a rather self-indulgent and frivolous preference for remaining an observer.
DIARY 6th January, 1940
We dine with Victor Cazalet, who has Eddy and the Anthony Eden family staying with him. Anthony is in good form. I can see that he still loathes the Prime Minister, whom he regards as obstinate, opinionated, rather mean and completely ignorant of the main issues involved. He also dislikes Sam Hoare," whom he calls 'Aunt Tabitha'. He feels that Kingsley Wood is a help since he is truthful. He believes that the manner of Hore-Belisha's dismissal will have shaken the P.M.'s position.
He repeats at length the story of his own resignation. It boils down to this. He said to the P.M., 'If you check Italy in Spain you will check Germany in Austria.' The P.M. simply could not understand that formula. The final Grandi interview, which led to his resignation, was a farce. Grandi said things that were not true, and the P.M. nodded his head in acquiescence throughout. He is certain that it was Horace Wilson who secured his dismissal.
Anthony is very much in favour of my Penguin, and has bought many copies. He says that I have not stated the Rhineland thing correctly. Hitler's aim was (1) to get the Rhineland; (2) to split France and us over it. Gamelin wanted to resist, but Flandin was not with him. We wished to keep out of it. If Flandin had said, 'We attack', then we could not have kept aloof. But as he said, 'We shall apply economic sanctions', we were able to say, 'We cannot follow you.' He contends therefore that though Hitler got the Rhineland, he did not succeed in separating France from us, and that although he scored a great strategical triumph he did not score a diplomatic triumph.
DIARY 7th January, 1940
I am amused by the effect of Hore-Belisha's dismissal. We in the House would assume that it was due to the fact that having told so many lies he had sacrificed the confidence of the country. But not at all. It seems that the country regard him as a second Haldane and a moderniser of the Army. The line is that he has been ousted by an intrigue of the Army chiefs, and there is a general uproar about being ruled by dictators in brass hats. The Germans could make great capital out of all this consternation, were it not that Belisha is a Jew. Yet the general effect will be (a)among the unknowing that Belisha has been sacked because he supported the private against the officer; (b) among the cognoscenti that he has been ousted because he told lies, but that Chamberlain has managed the thing clumsily; (c) a vague suspicion that the Press are really anti-Chamberlain and are exaggerating this incident in order to attack him. My own feeling is that this is less a pro-Belisha than an anti-Chamberlain outburst.'
DIARY 13th January, 1940
There is a letter from St John Ervine in the Spectator attacking me bitterly for the article I wrote for the 5th January issue. I had told a story about a private being turned out of a restaurant by 'a major in a minor regiment'. It is interesting to observe that what arouses Ervine's rage is not the ills of the poor private, but my reference to 'a minor regiment'. This is another indication of the great and angry tide which is rising against the governing classes. I have always been on the side of the under-dog, but I have also believed in the principle of aristocracy. I have hated the rich but I have loved learning, scholarship, intelligence and the humanities. Suddenly I am faced with the fact that all these lovely things are supposed to be 'class privileges'. The snobbishness of the British people (that factor upon which the aristocratic principle relied and often exploited) has suddenly turned to venom. When I find that my whole class is being assailed, I feel part of them, a feeling that I have never had before. Thus this afternoon, as we walked through the frozen woods together, Vita said, 'It is not as if we were fighting to preserve the things we care for. This war, whatever happens, will destroy them.' We imagine that we are fighting for liberty and our standards of civilization. But is it perfectly certain that by these phrases we do not mean the cultured life which we lead? I know that such a life, as lived by Vita and myself, is 'good' in the philosophical sense. We are humane, charitable, just and not vulgar. By God, we are not vulgar! Yet is it any more than an elegant arabesque upon the corridors of history?
DIARY 17th January, 1940
An Eden Group dinner at the Carlton. Amery, Cranborne, Spears, Harold Macmillan and others. Bower is there. He is very frank and informative. He says that we have got the submarine menace taped, and although there will be occasional losses, it is no longer a major menace. We have also been able to discover the nature of the magnetic mine and devise adequate counter-measures. But the bombers are prohibited by the Cabinet from bombing, and although they have been two or three times over Wilhelmshaven and seen below them a huge battleship in course of construction, plus endless submarines, they have been prohibited from dropping a single bomb. The Group agrees that this is a very serious situation, and it is disclosed that there is still a group in the War Cabinet working for appeasement and at present in negotiation via Bruning to make peace with the German General Staff on condition that they eliminate Hitler. We discuss the means by which this intrigue can be countered. Shall we organise an attack upon Horace Wilson in the Press? Should we start a House of Commons campaign and distribute questions among our Group in such a way as will indicate to the House that there is a concerted movement? Here again we hesitate, for we do not wish to give the impression of disunity. Cranborne then suggests that a very small committee should be created of very respectable Conservatives like Wardlaw-Milne upon which we should be represented by Amery and who would exercise pressure on the Cabinet. We all agree that such pressure would only be possible if it could be indicated that in the event of reluctance on the part of the Government, we should tell them quite franldy that we will go to the leaders of the Opposition and promise them that if they insist on a Secret Session we shall go to the point not only of supporting them at that session but of voting against the Government if necessary. I really feel that our Group is in a very strong position and can exercise what may prove to be a determinant influence.
DIARY 20th January, 1940
We listen to Winston Churchill on the wireless after dinner. He is a little too rhetorical, and I do not think that his speech will really have gone down with the masses. He is too belligerent for this pacifist age, and although once anger comes to steel our sloppiness, his voice will be welcome to them, at the moment it reminds them of heroism which they do not really feel.
Get a letter from Walter Lippmann.1 He says that the American people want us to win but wish to keep out. Thus there is a conflict in their desires, and they want to be assured that they ought to keep out. It is this gap between one desire and the other desire which offers so wide a fissure for German propaganda.
|